Review: Mister Creecher by Chris Priestley

Image from Authors Website

Title: Mister Creecher
Author: Chris Priestley
Publisher: Bloomsbury
Publication Date: 1 March 2012
Source: Review Copy
Rating: 2/5

Synopsis from Goodreads

Billy is a street urchin, pickpocket and petty thief. Mister Creecher is a monstrous giant of a man who terrifies all he meets. Their relationship begins as pure convenience. But a bond swiftly develops between these two misfits as their bloody journey takes them ever northwards on the trail of their target …Victor Frankenstein.

Friendship, trust and betrayal combine to form a dangerous liaison in this moving and frightening new book from Chris Priestley.

REVIEW BY ANDY – THE PEWTER WOLF

I want to quickly thank Emma for asking me to take part in her Classic Carnival. Always fun to take part in these after the amount of books and recommendations you give me, Emma. (My pleasure Andy I like to share)

In London 1818, Billy is many things. Street urchin, pick pocket, petty thief. So, when he is attacked by another, he is saved by a giant of a man who he names Mister Creecher. When Mister Creecher offers Billy a job, Billy takes it, purely as Mister Creecher promises to protect him. It was a deal of pure  convenience. But the more time they spend together, they become friends as Billy follows Creecher’s target… one Victor Frankenstein.

Now, I have to admit something before I go on. First, I have never read Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, so I can’t turn round and go “This happens alongside Frankenstein like a companion novel.”. It was after I read the book and reading the Book’s extras did I go “Oh, so you could read them side-by-side… Ok!”

My view on this book: I didn’t click with it. I just didn’t warm to this story, I’m afraid. I think it’s mainly because of the writing style for this book. It was trying so hard to fit the time period that it was jarring for me as a modern day reader to click with it.

Another problem I had was the characters. We were meant to be on Billy and Mister Creecher’s side, rooting for them to succeed. But I didn’t. I never had that connection to the characters that made me root for them. For me, this is a big thing. If I connect to a character – whether they be a hero of the story of the anti-hero – then I will be rooting for them or I would understand what has motivated them to do what they are doing.

However, with me going a bit negative on this book, I did like the subtle hints in this book. When Billy meet Mary Shelley and her husband, and then the twist in the final chapter that connects Frankenstein to another classic … I like these tiny things.

But the story on the whole wasn’t my cup of tea. It was a struggle for me and when you threaten to stab it with a very sharp knife, that’s not a good sign… But because I found it a struggle doesn’t mean you will and I hope that, if this does interest you, you would read it and form your opinions on the book.

Previous

Review: Masque of the Red Death by Bethany Griffin

Next

Classics Carnival: Guest Post: PRIDE by AE Rought

2 Comments

  1. Avatar

    Jenni

    Such an interesting review, I’ve seen a few that say similar things. I really enjoyed the book but I can see how it wouldn’t work for everyone.

  2. Avatar

    oh no! I loved this book and its such a shame that you didnt enjoy it! I can understand why though completely. You really must read Frankenstien though, its such an amazing classic!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén